Chile Foreign Policy Faces a Hostile Congressional Hearing

This post is also available in:

The left summons Kast’s foreign minister

On September 8 the Chilean Chamber of Deputies voted 57 to 49, with one abstention, to interpellate Foreign Minister Francisco Pérez Mackenna.

It is the first interpellation of any minister under President José Antonio Kast (@joseantoniokast), and the first ever aimed at a Chilean foreign minister.

For readers unfamiliar with the term, an interpellation is a tool of the Chilean Constitution. The Chamber summons a minister to answer a written questionnaire in person, question by question, in front of the full chamber. It cannot remove him.

It is political theater with a microphone, the closest Chilean equivalent of a hostile congressional hearing in the United States.

The questionnaire runs to 13 topics. Socialist Deputy Nelson Venegas, who led the 59 opposition signers, insisted the move was patriotic: “This is an action in defense of our country’s higher interests.”

The session was scheduled for September 28, right after Kast and his minister return from the UN General Assembly in New York. The timing sends its own message.

Kast did not blink. “We have a great foreign minister,” he said, and closed ranks with him.

Six months into a conservative government, the left’s answer is not a better foreign policy. It is procedure.

The strait that was always Chilean

The loudest chapter of the questionnaire concerns the Strait of Magellan.

Here the facts are stubborn.

Chilean sovereignty over the entire strait was settled by the 1881 Boundary Treaty and confirmed by the 1984 Treaty of Peace and Friendship. Chile has held it in effective possession for 145 years.

The recent noise came from careless statements by Argentine officials.

Senator Patricia Bullrich claimed her country controlled the strait, then sent a written apology admitting she had confused it with the Beagle Channel and recognizing that the strait belongs entirely to Chile.

Then came the part the left prefers not to discuss.

On September 3, Kast and President Javier Milei signed a joint declaration affirming that the legal regime of the strait rests on the 1881 and 1984 treaties.

It is the first official document in which Argentina affirms Chilean sovereignty over the whole strait.

The declaration is a formality, since the strait was always Chilean, but it is a valuable one: two friendly governments settled in days what hostile governments would have let fester for years.

Good bilateral relations produced the concession.

The left now interpellates the man who obtained it.

Leaving a club that time forgot

The questionnaire also demands explanations for Chile’s exit from the Non-Aligned Movement, announced on August 5 after 55 years of membership.

The symmetry is hard to miss: the socialist Salvador Allende took Chile into the movement in 1971, and Kast took it out.

The Foreign Ministry explained that the organization “was created as a political movement in another global context and does not respond to the new challenges of the current international reality.”

Chile’s Communist Party called the exit “anachronistic clumsiness,” a solemn way of saying Chile did something silly and out of time.

They have it backwards.

The silly, out-of-time thing was staying in a Cold War relic for three decades after the Cold War ended.

We made the same point when we wrote about Indonesia’s non-aligned balancing act: non-alignment usually describes a preference, not a policy.

Bachelet and the arithmetic of realism

Another charge is the withdrawal of Chile’s support for Michelle Bachelet, the Socialist former president, as candidate for UN Secretary-General.

The outgoing leftist government of Gabriel Boric nominated her together with Brazil and Mexico, without ever consulting the incoming administration.

Even Chilean conservatives noted at the time that it was not a candidacy of State.

Kast withdrew the sponsorship in March, saying that promoting her would carry a significant cost for Chile.

The Foreign Ministry judged the candidacy unviable.

The left called the decision an international embarrassment.

Then the numbers arrived: by August, Bachelet ranked seventh out of eight candidates in the informal straw polls. That is not sabotage. That is arithmetic.

The Donroe Doctrine and the pro-Chile answer

The questionnaire saves special outrage for Washington.

The Trump administration’s hemispheric strategy, which the press has nicknamed the Donroe Doctrine, a blend of Donald Trump and the Monroe Doctrine, has already reshaped the geopolitics of the region: the capture of Nicolás Maduro, strikes on cartel drug boats, an oil blockade on Cuba, and steady pressure against Chinese footholds in strategic sectors.

Chile matters in that map. It is the world’s largest copper producer and one of its top lithium producers, exactly the minerals China wants.

At the Foro Madrid conference in Santiago, US Ambassador Brandon Judd said that carrying out the doctrine “becomes very easy” under Kast.

Predictably, the left exploded, calling it interference.

Kast’s reply was better than any communiqué: his government applies the pro-Chile doctrine. That is the whole point the left refuses to grasp.

An ally is not a colony. When national interests align, cooperation is not submission; it is strategy.

Why Chile’s turn matters to conservatives

To understand why any of this matters north of the equator, understand what Chile is.

It is one of the most prosperous and developed countries in South America, and prosperity attracts what prosperity always attracts: mass illegal immigration, and with it the crime that follows.

Chileans lived what Americans lived, and they voted the same way. Kast won 59 percent of the vote and carried all 16 regions, part of the conservative wave now remaking Latin America.

Six months later the results are measurable.

Illegal border detections collapsed from 7,032 to 971 after the government dug a border trench, deployed drones, and sent the armed forces to the northern frontier.

Expulsions are up, voluntary departures are up, and the government launched a Return Plan to send illegal immigrants home.

Inflation stands at 2.4 percent, the lowest since 2020, a real achievement in a region where money loses value faster than promises.

The government also unblocked about 7,000 million dollars in stalled investment projects, the kind of quiet reform that creates jobs without a single new tax.

The lawfare reflex

Which brings us back to the interpellation.

American conservatives will recognize the script instantly, because the same script has already played in Washington.

When conservatives govern and deliver, the left does not answer with arguments. It reaches for procedure: hearings, investigations, committees, anything with a microphone and a gavel.

The Chile foreign policy debate now on display in Santiago is the same lawfare reflex wearing a different flag.

So on September 28, fresh from representing his country at the United Nations, Pérez Mackenna will sit for hours of televised questioning about a strait that Argentina just confirmed is Chilean, an exit from a club that stopped mattering decades ago, and a friendship with Washington that serves Chilean interests.

It is genuinely hard to know whether the opposition believes any of it, or whether the cameras are the entire point.

What is not hard to know is how Chile foreign policy under Kast is actually performing: borders under control, inflation tamed, sovereignty affirmed on paper by the neighbor, and allies in Washington and Buenos Aires instead of adversaries.

The hemisphere is not turning right by accident. It is turning right by results.

Strong allies make a strong hemisphere.